Klaus Wein

WW2 Senior Moderator
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Klaus Wein

Recent Profile Visitors

134 profile views
  1. Hi Stampton, I will be joining Mauser on this one. My interactions with you were also very limited but apparently from the few ones I had I even warned and banned you. You might even be a good CO and everything but I also feel a lack of maturity in you. May be due to some people that you hang out with. In regards to the application, I think that it is fine. As I have stated in other applications some stuff only comes with experience. Therefore I will be giving you a Neutral. Best of luck, Dr Klaus Wein
  2. Hello, I was not the admin that banned but I was there with him. There is not much to say about this situation. If I recall corectly you are a veteran player and you had previous FailRP warnings (that's why the 3 and half days). You know that those stuff are not real. There is no such thing as /gestapocadet and your argument that you didn't know is just not real. I belive that the ban should remain. -1
  3. As others have stated, your application is very well written. It demonstrates that you put effort and dedication into it. I have chatted with you some times, and from what I have seen you are a very likable guy and a brilliant one as well. I think that it would be great to have you on the staff team and I look forward to working with you! +1 Best of luck!
  4. Hello I was the staff member that banned you. Your story is all correct but you forgot to mention the part where you were kidnapped in the plaza. Also just to correct you, you didn't crash. You disconnected by yourself. And that's why you were banned for LTARP and not LTAP as you referred. Best Regards, Klaus Wein
  5. -1 As mentioned above, embassies are very useless. People play on it for the first couple of days and then they just die out. Also, there is already the Bulgarian one so it wouldn't make sense to add another one just because it's Romanian.
  6. It's not about what I want. These stuff don't go through me. You do you.
  7. You need to this with more attention. Just look at it. Does it look good to you? Everything out of place, questions without an answer, answers that don't make sense. I mean put some effort into it.
  8. "Explain the situation of your ban from your point of view in detail: Doesn't say" - Seriously!?Again?! "Do you think your ban was justified: Yes I think my ban was justified: Yes I think my ban was justified" - I mean if you say that your ban was justifided, why did you say that you dont know the reason of the ban? Because you can only agree with it if you know what it is.
  9. Hello Eccard, After reading your application I decided that I will be giving a Neutral and I will explain why. To start your application seems very "bland", kinda looks that you didn't put much effort into it in terms of its looks. The other thing that I would like to point is, as some above already referred, the lack of detail in some answers. Nevertheless, I believe that some of the situations that are asked about in the staff app can only be improved while participating in them. You have a great IC rank which gives experience and I assume you have lots of patience, overall you are the
  10. I was not the staff that banned neither know the situation in detail, but I am sure that if you were permabanned, it is undoubtedly for something more severe than FailRP. I also believe that if you really cared about the ban you should have made this thread when you were actually banned because now it is just lacking a lot of detail since you don't remember the situation anymore.
  11. As everyone stated above, your application is very well written and with great detail. You know what you wrote. You are a very active member on the server, day and night. You were and still are a very likable person, very calm and respectful. I will be giving a +1 to this application as I believe you would be an extraordinary addition to the staff team. Best of luck!
  12. +1 After taking a look at your application I believe that you have what it takes to be a staff member. Of course, some stuff isn't perfect but we learn how to do the job with time. You are extremely active and social which is a big plus. Although you were uncombanned recently, I still believe you should be giving a chance. After all, I am proof of it. I was also comm banned and was giving a second chance. Don't see why you shouldn't be given one.
  13. Hello Heinz, The situation wasn't quite like that. I was part of an OrPo patrol and we were looking for a stolen fire truck and we found it near the TS outside Berlin. When we were approaching it we saw you running near it. We left the car to stop you and we had our guns pointed at you (3 of us) and you pulled out your STG44 and of course that one of my colleagues started shooting you. When you were still lying on the floor I clearly said "Who is this guy? I am taking him to a sit." and you were still there so you heard what I said. I tried Tping you so that we could clear that out but a
  14. RP Character name/s: Klaus Wein Steam Name: Tom Steam ID (https://steamidfinder.com/): STEAM_0:1:443842720 Age when applying: I am 17 years old. What country do you currently reside in? What is your time-zone?: I reside in Portugal and my time zone is GMT+0. Can you speak and type English fluently?: Yes, I can. Current total game-time on the server (type utime_enable 1 in the console if you can't see your game time): 10w 2d 09h IC Rank(s) & OOC Donation Rank(s) on WW2-RP: SS-Schulungsamt Schulungsgehelfer, Platinu
  15. Your In-game name: Klaus Wein Your Steam ID: STEAM_0:1:443842720 Reason of the ban: I have no idea. It wasn't explained to me at the time. Date you were banned on: June, 06, 2020 Duration of ban: I was banned permanently. Admin who banned you (In-game name / Steam name/ Steam ID): Again, I have no idea who did it. Explain the situation of your ban from your point of view in detail: Has I stated before I don't know what I got banned for. I simply tried to join the server one day and was permanently banned. Do you think your ban was justified: I d